a033110.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
T Quarterly
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For the
fiscal quarter ended: March 31, 2010 or
£ Transition
report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For the
transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission
file number: 0-25426
NATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
74-1871327
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
11500
North MoPac Expressway
Austin,
Texas
|
|
78759
|
(address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(zip
code)
|
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (512) 338-9119
__________________________
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes T No
£
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes £ No
£
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer |
T |
Accelerated filer |
£
|
Non-accelerated filer |
£
|
Smaller
reporting company |
£
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £ No
T
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
Outstanding
at May 3, 2010
|
Common
Stock - $0.01 par value
|
77,522,406 |
NATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
INDEX
|
|
|
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Page No.
|
|
|
|
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Item
2
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item
3
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
Item
4
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
Item
1A
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
Item
2
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
Item
5
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
Item
6
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
NATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|
March
31, 2010
|
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash
equivalents
|
|
$ |
184,618 |
|
|
$ |
201,465 |
|
Short-term
investments
|
|
|
110,952 |
|
|
|
87,196 |
|
Accounts
receivable,
net
|
|
|
104,818 |
|
|
|
103,957 |
|
Inventories,
net
|
|
|
89,826 |
|
|
|
86,515 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
34,937 |
|
|
|
36,523 |
|
Deferred
income taxes,
net
|
|
|
15,222 |
|
|
|
16,522 |
|
Total
current
assets
|
|
|
540,373 |
|
|
|
532,178 |
|
Property
and equipment,
net
|
|
|
152,567 |
|
|
|
153,265 |
|
Goodwill,
net
|
|
|
69,296 |
|
|
|
64,779 |
|
Intangible
assets,
net
|
|
|
48,369 |
|
|
|
43,390 |
|
Other
long-term
assets
|
|
|
19,647 |
|
|
|
19,417 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
830,252 |
|
|
$ |
813,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
27,450 |
|
|
$ |
23,502 |
|
Accrued
compensation
|
|
|
19,465 |
|
|
|
14,934 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
60,972 |
|
|
|
57,242 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other
liabilities
|
|
|
12,619 |
|
|
|
8,560 |
|
Other
taxes
payable
|
|
|
12,306 |
|
|
|
14,181 |
|
Total
current
liabilities
|
|
|
132,812 |
|
|
|
118,419 |
|
Deferred
income
taxes
|
|
|
25,088 |
|
|
|
25,012 |
|
Liability
for uncertain tax
positions
|
|
|
10,926 |
|
|
|
11,062 |
|
Other
long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
4,259 |
|
|
|
4,116 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
173,085 |
|
|
|
158,609 |
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock: par value $0.01; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common
stock: par value $0.01; 180,000,000 shares authorized; 77,325,552
and 77,367,874 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
|
|
362,857 |
|
|
|
336,446 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
285,422 |
|
|
|
303,655 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
8,115 |
|
|
|
13,545 |
|
Total
stockholders’
equity
|
|
|
657,167 |
|
|
|
654,420 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’
equity
|
|
$ |
830,252 |
|
|
$ |
813,029 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
NATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
(in
thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
175,395 |
|
|
$ |
143,450 |
|
Software
maintenance
|
|
|
15,696 |
|
|
|
14,349 |
|
Total
net
sales
|
|
|
191,091 |
|
|
|
157,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
42,262 |
|
|
|
39,556 |
|
Software
maintenance
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
1,327 |
|
Total
cost of
sales
|
|
|
43,242 |
|
|
|
40,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
147,849 |
|
|
|
116,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and
marketing
|
|
|
74,441 |
|
|
|
68,826 |
|
Research
and
development
|
|
|
38,546 |
|
|
|
34,789 |
|
General
and
administrative
|
|
|
15,340 |
|
|
|
15,780 |
|
Total
operating
expenses
|
|
|
128,327 |
|
|
|
119,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income
(loss)
|
|
|
19,522 |
|
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
Net
foreign exchange gain
(loss)
|
|
|
(698 |
) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
Other
income (expense),
net
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
19,472 |
|
|
|
(2,429 |
) |
Provision
for (benefit from) income
taxes
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
(2,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
18,353 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding –
basic
|
|
|
77,380 |
|
|
|
77,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding –
diluted
|
|
|
78,435 |
|
|
|
77,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
declared per
share
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
NATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
(in
thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash
flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
18,353 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and
amortization
|
|
|
9,442 |
|
|
|
8,385 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
4,916 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
Tax
expense/(benefit) from deferred income
taxes
|
|
|
1,709 |
|
|
|
(1,486 |
) |
Tax
expense from stock option
plans
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
30,631 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(3,006 |
) |
|
|
4,740 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
assets
|
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(5,766 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
3,618 |
|
|
|
(5,747 |
) |
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
Taxes
and other
liabilities
|
|
|
2,162 |
|
|
|
(11,084 |
) |
Net
cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
41,601 |
|
|
|
24,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(5,271 |
) |
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
Capitalization
of internally developed
software
|
|
|
(3,404 |
) |
|
|
(3,114 |
) |
Additions
to other
intangibles
|
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
Acquisition,
net of cash
received
|
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Purchases
of short-term and long-term
investments
|
|
|
(35,823 |
) |
|
|
(11,850 |
) |
Sales
and maturities of short-term and long-term
investments
|
|
|
9,037 |
|
|
|
4,026 |
|
Net
cash (used by) investing
activities
|
|
|
(38,195 |
) |
|
|
(15,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
Repurchase
of common
stock
|
|
|
(30,935 |
) |
|
|
(9,186 |
) |
Dividends
paid
|
|
|
(10,072 |
) |
|
|
(9,285 |
) |
Tax
(benefit) from stock option
plans
|
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
(242 |
) |
Net
cash (used by) financing
activities
|
|
|
(20,253 |
) |
|
|
(11,476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(16,847 |
) |
|
|
(1,952 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of
period
|
|
|
201,465 |
|
|
|
229,400 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$ |
184,618 |
|
|
$ |
227,448 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
NATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION
Note
1 – Basis of presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the
year ended December 31, 2009, included in our annual report on Form 10-K, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In our opinion, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring items) considered necessary to present fairly our financial
position at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and the results of our
operations and cash flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31,
2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
year ending December 31, 2010. These financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Note
2 – Earnings per share
Basic
earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is
computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares
and common share equivalents outstanding (if dilutive) during each period. The
number of common share equivalents, which include stock options and restricted
stock units, is computed using the treasury stock method.
The
reconciliation of the denominators used to calculate basic EPS and diluted EPS
for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Weighted
average shares
outstanding-basic
|
|
|
77,380 |
|
|
|
77,277 |
|
Plus:
Common share equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options, restricted stock
units
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Weighted
average shares
outstanding-diluted
|
|
|
78,435 |
|
|
|
77,436 |
|
Stock
options to acquire 1,297,000 shares and 5,495,000 shares for the three month
periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were excluded in the
computations of diluted EPS because the effect of including the stock options
would have been anti-dilutive.
Note
3 – Cash, cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments
Cash,
cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments consist of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
As
of
March
31, 2010
|
|
|
As
of
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
73,787 |
|
|
$ |
85,612 |
|
Cash
equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
market
accounts
|
|
|
110,831 |
|
|
|
115,853 |
|
Total
cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
184,618 |
|
|
|
201,465 |
|
Short-term
investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
bonds
|
|
|
16,564 |
|
|
|
12,549 |
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
21,971 |
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
U.S.
treasuries and
agencies
|
|
|
28,234 |
|
|
|
21,033 |
|
Foreign
government
bonds
|
|
|
32,830 |
|
|
|
34,674 |
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
Auction
rate
securities
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
|
|
8,177 |
|
Auction
rate securities put
option
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Total
short-term
investments
|
|
|
110,952 |
|
|
|
87,196 |
|
Total
cash, cash equivalents and
investments
|
|
$ |
295,570 |
|
|
$ |
288,661 |
|
The
following table summarizes unrealized gains and losses related to our
investments designated as available-for-sale (in thousands):
|
|
As
of March 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
|
Cumulative
Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Municipal
bonds
|
|
$ |
16,502 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
16,564 |
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
21,937 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,971 |
|
U.S.
treasuries and
agencies
|
|
|
28,271 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
28,235 |
|
Foreign
government
bonds
|
|
|
35,700 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,030 |
) |
|
|
32,829 |
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
Auction
rate
securities
|
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
Auction
rate securities put option
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
402 |
|
Total
investments
|
|
$ |
113,763 |
|
|
$ |
708 |
|
|
$ |
(489 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,030 |
) |
|
$ |
110,952 |
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
|
Cumulative
Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Municipal
bonds
|
|
$ |
12,491 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
12,549 |
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
U.S.
treasuries and
agencies
|
|
|
21,080 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,033 |
|
Foreign
government
bonds
|
|
|
36,105 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,507 |
) |
|
|
34,674 |
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
Auction
rate
securities
|
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,177 |
|
Auction
rate securities put option
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Total
investments
|
|
$ |
88,507 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
$ |
(471 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,507 |
) |
|
$ |
87,196 |
|
The
following table summarizes the contractual maturities of our investments
designated as available-for-sale (in thousands):
|
|
As
of March 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Due
in less than 1
year
|
|
$ |
57,581 |
|
|
$ |
56,227 |
|
|
$ |
44,029 |
|
|
$ |
43,267 |
|
Due
in 1 to 5
years
|
|
|
56,182 |
|
|
|
54,725 |
|
|
|
44,478 |
|
|
|
43,929 |
|
Total
investments
|
|
$ |
113,763 |
|
|
$ |
110,952 |
|
|
$ |
88,507 |
|
|
$ |
87,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
in less than 1 year
|
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Municipal
bonds
|
|
$ |
12,902 |
|
|
$ |
12,949 |
|
|
$ |
4,103 |
|
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
6,413 |
|
|
|
6,480 |
|
|
|
5,384 |
|
|
|
5,473 |
|
U.S.
treasuries and
agencies
|
|
|
9,149 |
|
|
|
9,138 |
|
|
|
5,065 |
|
|
|
5,057 |
|
Foreign
government
bonds
|
|
|
17,764 |
|
|
|
16,307 |
|
|
|
18,124 |
|
|
|
17,274 |
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
Auction
rate
securities
|
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
8,177 |
|
Auction
rate securities put option
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Total
investments
|
|
$ |
57,581 |
|
|
$ |
56,227 |
|
|
$ |
44,029 |
|
|
$ |
43,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
in 1 to 5 years
|
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Adjusted
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Municipal
bonds
|
|
$ |
3,600 |
|
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
|
$ |
8,388 |
|
|
$ |
8,439 |
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
15,524 |
|
|
|
15,491 |
|
|
|
2,094 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
U.S.
treasuries and
agencies
|
|
|
19,122 |
|
|
|
19,096 |
|
|
|
16,015 |
|
|
|
15,976 |
|
Foreign
government
bonds
|
|
|
17,936 |
|
|
|
16,523 |
|
|
|
17,981 |
|
|
|
17,400 |
|
Total
investments
|
|
$ |
56,182 |
|
|
$ |
54,725 |
|
|
$ |
44,478 |
|
|
$ |
43,929 |
|
Note 4 – Fair value
measurements
FASB ASC
820, Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures (FASB ASC 820) clarifies the definition of fair value,
prescribes methods for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy
based on the inputs used to measure fair value and expands disclosures about the
use of fair value measurements. Effective January 1, 2010, we adopted the update
to FASB ASC 820 that required additional disclosures and clarified existing
disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The additional disclosures
include transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 as well as activity within Level 3
fair value measurements. The update also provides amendments that clarify
existing disclosures on level of disaggregation and disclosures about inputs and
valuation techniques. The adoption of the update to FASB ASC 820 did not have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The
following tables present our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs
used to determine fair value (in thousands). We did not have any items that were
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
(unaudited)
|
|
Description
|
|
March
31, 2010
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
Market
Funds
|
|
$ |
110,831 |
|
|
$ |
110,831 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Short-term
investments available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
bonds
|
|
|
16,564 |
|
|
|
16,564 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
21,971 |
|
|
|
21,971 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
U.S.
treasuries and
agencies
|
|
|
28,234 |
|
|
|
28,234 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign
government
bonds
|
|
|
32,830 |
|
|
|
32,830 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Auction
rate
securities
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,198 |
|
Auction
rate securities put option
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
402 |
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
10,436 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,436 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
232,219 |
|
|
$ |
213,183 |
|
|
$ |
10,436 |
|
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
Description
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money
Market
Funds
|
|
$ |
115,853 |
|
|
$ |
115,853 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Short-term
investments available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
bonds
|
|
|
12,549 |
|
|
|
12,549 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
|
|
7,587 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
U.S.
treasuries and
agencies
|
|
|
21,033 |
|
|
|
21,033 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign
government
bonds
|
|
|
34,674 |
|
|
|
34,674 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Auction
rate
securities
|
|
|
8,177 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,177 |
|
Auction
rate securities put option
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,016 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
214,065 |
|
|
$ |
194,449 |
|
|
$ |
11,016 |
|
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
Short-term
investments available for sale
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
Balance at December 31,
2009
|
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
Total
gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
Included
in
earnings
|
|
|
402 |
|
Included
in other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
losses
(realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
Included
in
earnings
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
Included
in other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
— |
|
Purchases,
issuances and
settlements
|
|
|
— |
|
Transfer
in and/or out of Level
3
|
|
|
— |
|
Ending
Balance at March 31,
2010
|
|
$ |
8,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
amount of total gains or (losses) for the period included in earnings (or
changes in net assets) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or
losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Short-term
investments available-for-sale are valued using a market approach (Level 1)
based on the quoted market prices of identical instruments when available or
other observable inputs such as trading prices of identical instruments in
active markets. Short-term investments available-for-sale consists of debt
securities issued by states of the U.S. and political subdivisions of the
states, corporate debt securities and debt securities issued by U.S. government
corporations and agencies. All short-term investments available-for-sale have
contractual maturities of less than 24 months.
Derivatives
include foreign currency forward and option contracts. Our foreign currency
forward contracts are valued using an income approach (Level 2) based on the
spot rate less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount. Our foreign
currency option contracts are valued using a market approach based on the quoted
market prices which are derived from observable inputs including current and
future spot rates, interest rate spreads as well as quoted market prices of
identical instruments.
Short-term
investments available-for-sale included in Level 3 are reported at their fair
market value and consist of auction rate securities backed by education loan
revenue bonds. One of our auction rate securities is from the Vermont Student
Assistance Corporation and has a par value of $2.2 million. The other of our
auction rate securities is from the New Hampshire Health and Education
Facilities Authority and has a par value of $6.4 million. The ratings for these
securities at March 31, 2010, were Baa3/A/AAA and Aaa/NR/AAA, respectively.
Historically, we reported the fair market value of these securities at par as
differences between par value and the purchase price or settlement value were
historically comprised of accrued interest. Auction rate securities are variable
rate debt instruments whose interest rates are typically reset approximately
every 7 to 35 days. On March 26, 2010, and in prior auction periods beginning in
February 2008, the auction process for these securities failed. At March 31,
2010, we reported these as short-term investments at their estimated fair market
value of $8.2 million.
In
November 2008, we accepted the UBS Auction Rate Securities Rights (the “Rights”)
agreement offered by UBS as a liquidity alternative to the failed auction
process. This Rights agreement is related to the auction rates securities
discussed above. The Rights agreement is a nontransferable right to sell our
auction rate securities, at par value, back to UBS at any time during the period
June 30, 2010, through July 2, 2012. At March 31, 2010, we reported the Rights
agreement at its estimated fair market value of $402,000 as a component of
short-term debt securities available for sale.
The
estimated fair market value of both the auction rate securities and the Rights
agreement was determined using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as
prescribed by FASB ASC 820. We considered many factors in determining the fair
market value of the auction rate securities as well as our corresponding Rights
agreement at March 31, 2010, including the fact that the debt instruments
underlying the auction rate securities have redemption features which call for
redemption at 100% of par value, current credit curves for like securities and
discount factors to account for the illiquidity of the market for these
securities. During the three month period ended March 31, 2010, we did not make
any changes to our valuation techniques or related inputs.
Note
5 – Derivative instruments and hedging activities
FASB ASC
815, Derivatives and
Hedging, (FASB ASC 815) requires companies to recognize all of their
derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the statement of
financial position at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value
(i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has
been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on
the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are
designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the
hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge,
cash flow hedge, or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign
operation.
We have
operations in over 40 countries. Sales outside of the Americas as a percentage
of consolidated sales were 59% and 57% for the three month periods ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our activities expose us to a variety of market
risks, including the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
These financial risks are monitored and managed by us as an integral part of our
overall risk management program.
We
maintain a foreign currency risk management strategy that uses derivative
instruments (foreign currency forward and purchased option contracts) to help
protect our earnings and cash flows from fluctuations caused by the volatility
in currency exchange rates. Movements in foreign currency exchange rates pose a
risk to our operations and competitive position, since exchange rate changes may
affect our profitability and cash flow, and the business or pricing strategies
of our non-U.S. based competitors.
The vast
majority of our foreign sales are denominated in the customers’ local currency.
We purchase foreign currency forward and option contracts as hedges of
forecasted sales that are denominated in foreign currencies and as hedges of
foreign currency denominated receivables. These contracts are entered into to
help protect against the risk that the eventual dollar-net-cash inflows
resulting from such sales or firm commitments will be adversely affected by
changes in exchange rates. We also purchase foreign currency forward contracts
as hedges of forecasted expenses that are denominated in foreign currencies.
These contracts are entered into to help protect against the risk that the
eventual dollar-net-cash outflows resulting from foreign currency operating and
cost of revenue expenses will be adversely affected by changes in exchange
rates.
We
designate foreign currency forward and purchased option contracts as cash flow
hedges of forecasted revenues or forecasted expenses. In addition, we hedge our
foreign currency denominated balance sheet exposures using foreign currency
forward contracts. These derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments
under FASB ASC 815. None of our derivative instruments contain a
credit-risk-related contingent feature.
Cash
flow hedges
To help
protect against the reduction in value caused by a fluctuation in foreign
currency exchange rates of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from
international sales or expenses over the next one to two years, we have
instituted a foreign currency cash flow hedging program. We hedge portions of
our forecasted revenue and forecasted expenses denominated in foreign currencies
with forward and purchased option contracts. For forward contracts, when the
dollar strengthens significantly against the foreign currencies, the change in
the present value of future foreign currency cash flows may be offset by the
change in the fair value of the forward contracts designated as hedges. For
option contracts, when the dollar strengthens significantly against the foreign
currencies, the change in the present value of future foreign currency cash
flows may be offset by the change in the fair value of the option contracts net
of the premium paid designated as hedges. Our foreign currency purchased option
contracts are purchased “at-the-money” or “out-of-the-money”. We purchase
foreign currency forward and option contracts for up to 100% of our forecasted
exposures in selected currencies (primarily in Euro, Japanese yen, British pound
sterling, South Korean won and Hungarian forint) and limit the duration of these
contracts to 40 months or less.
For
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified
into earnings in the same line item (net sales, operating expenses, or cost of
sales) associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or
periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses
on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components
excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings
or expenses during the current period and are classified as a component of “net
foreign exchange gain (loss)”. Hedge effectiveness of foreign currency forwards
and purchased option contracts designated as cash flow hedges are measured by
comparing the hedging instrument’s cumulative change in fair value from
inception to maturity to the forecasted transaction’s terminal
value.
We held
forward contracts with a notional amount of $21.6 million dollar equivalent of
Euro, $3.1 million dollar equivalent of British pound sterling, $19 million
dollar equivalent of Japanese yen, and $23.3 million dollar equivalent of
Hungarian forint at March 31, 2010. These contracts are for terms of up to 24
months. At December 31, 2009, we held forward contracts with a notional amount
of $28.6 million dollar equivalent of Euro, $4.0 million dollar equivalent of
British pound sterling, $24.4 million dollar equivalent of Japanese yen, and
$17.8 million dollar equivalent of Hungarian forint.
We held
purchased option contracts with a notional amount of $21.5 million dollar
equivalent of Euro at March 31, 2010. These contracts are for terms of up to 12
months. At December 31, 2009, we held purchased option contracts with a notional
amount of $28.4 million dollar equivalent of Euro.
At March
31, 2010, we expect to reclassify $4.3 million of gains on derivative
instruments from accumulated other comprehensive income to net sales during the
next twelve months when the hedged international sales occur, $2.4 million of
gains on derivative instruments from accumulated OCI to cost of sales and $1.1
million of gains on derivative instruments from accumulated OCI to operating
expenses during the next twelve months when the hedged international expenses
occur. Expected amounts are based on derivative valuations at March 31, 2010.
Actual results may vary as a result of changes in the corresponding exchange
rate subsequent to this date.
We did
not record any ineffectiveness during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, hedges with a notional amount of
$14.4 million were determined to be ineffective. As a result, we recorded a net
gain of $417,000 related to these hedges as a component of “net foreign exchange
gain (loss)”.
Other
derivatives
Other
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under FASB ASC 815 consist
primarily of foreign currency forward contracts that we use to hedge our foreign
denominated net receivable or net payable positions to help protect against the
change in value caused by a fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates. We
typically hedge up to 90% of our outstanding foreign denominated net receivables
or net payables and typically limit the duration of these foreign currency
forward contracts to approximately 90 days. The gain or loss on the derivatives
as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedge item attributable to the
hedged risk is recognized in current earnings under the line item “net foreign
exchange gain (loss)”. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we held
foreign currency forward contracts with a notional amount of $37.6 million and
$45.2 million, respectively.
The
following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets and the effect of derivative instruments on our
Consolidated Statements of Income.
Fair
Values of Derivative Instruments (in thousands):
|
Asset
Derivatives
|
|
|
March
31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Derivatives
designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – ST forwards
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
$ |
6,476 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
$ |
7,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – LT forwards
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
|
327 |
|
Other
long-term assets
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – ST options
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives designated as hedging
instruments
|
|
|
$ |
9,134 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
not designated as hedging
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – ST forwards
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
$ |
1,302 |
|
|
|
$ |
974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives
|
|
|
$ |
10,436 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,016 |
|
|
Liability
Derivatives
|
|
|
March
31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Derivatives
designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – ST forwards
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – LT forwards
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives designated as hedging
instruments
|
|
|
$ |
(143 |
) |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
not designated as hedging
instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – ST forwards
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$ |
(435 |
) |
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
|
|
|
$ |
(435 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives
|
|
|
$ |
(578 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(318 |
) |
The
following tables show the effect of derivative instruments on our Consolidated
Statements of Income for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively (in thousands):
March
31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
Derivatives
in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
|
|
Amount
of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)
|
|
Location
of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
|
|
Amount
of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
|
|
Location
of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
Amount
of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – forwards and options
|
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
Net
foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – forwards and options
|
|
|
(1,391 |
) |
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
769 |
|
Net
foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – forwards and options
|
|
|
(885 |
) |
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
368 |
|
Net
foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(761 |
) |
|
|
$ |
2,174 |
|
|
|
$ |
— |
|
March
31, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
Derivatives
in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship
|
|
Amount
of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI (Effective Portion)
|
|
Location
of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
|
|
Amount
of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
|
|
Location
of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
Amount
of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount
Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – forwards and options
|
|
$ |
3,796 |
|
Net
sales
|
|
$ |
2,633 |
|
Net
foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
$ |
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – forwards and options
|
|
|
(2,746 |
) |
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
Net
foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – forwards and options
|
|
|
(888 |
) |
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
Net
foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,112 |
|
|
|
$ |
417 |
|
Derivatives
not Designated as Hedging Instruments
|
Location
of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
|
|
Amount
of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
|
|
|
Amount
of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
March
31, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
Foreign
exchange contracts – forwards
|
Net
foreign exchange gain/(loss)
|
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
3,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
3,089 |
|
Note
6 – Inventories
Inventories,
net consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$ |
43,524 |
|
|
$ |
42,121 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
2,042 |
|
Finished
goods
|
|
|
43,699 |
|
|
|
42,352 |
|
|
|
$ |
89,826 |
|
|
$ |
86,515 |
|
Note
7 – Intangibles
Intangibles
at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
Carrying Amount
|
|
Capitalized
software development costs
|
|
$ |
42,494 |
|
|
$ |
(23,053 |
) |
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
|
$ |
38,928 |
|
|
$ |
(20,455 |
) |
|
$ |
18,473 |
|
Acquired
technology
|
|
|
32,830 |
|
|
|
(21,775 |
) |
|
|
11,055 |
|
|
|
28,022 |
|
|
|
(20,967 |
) |
|
|
7,055 |
|
Patents
|
|
|
19,482 |
|
|
|
(5,611 |
) |
|
|
13,871 |
|
|
|
19,033 |
|
|
|
(5,377 |
) |
|
|
13,656 |
|
Leasehold
equipment and other
|
|
|
12,978 |
|
|
|
(8,976 |
) |
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
12,577 |
|
|
|
(8,371 |
) |
|
|
4,206 |
|
|
|
$ |
107,784 |
|
|
$ |
(59,415 |
) |
|
$ |
48,369 |
|
|
$ |
98,560 |
|
|
$ |
(55,170 |
) |
|
$ |
43,390 |
|
Software
development costs capitalized for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 were $3.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively, and related
amortization expense was $2.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively.
Capitalized software development costs for the three month periods ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, included costs related to stock based compensation of
$163,000 and $156,000, respectively. Amortization of capitalized software
development costs is computed on an individual product basis for those products
available for market and is recognized based on the product’s estimated economic
life, generally three years. Patents are amortized using the straight-line
method over their estimated period of benefit, generally ten to seventeen years.
Total intangible assets amortization expenses were $4.2 million and $3.6 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009,
respectively.
Acquired
core technology and intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives,
which range from three to eight years. Amortization expense for acquisition
related intangibles was approximately $844,000 and $1.0 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, respectively, of which
approximately $722,000 and $887,000 was recorded in cost of sales, respectively,
and approximately $122,000 and $126,000 was recorded in operating expenses for
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009,
respectively.
Note
8 – Goodwill
The
carrying amount of goodwill as of March 31, 2010, is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Amount
|
|
Balance
as of December 31,
2009
|
|
$ |
64,779 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign
currency translation
impact
|
|
|
(483 |
) |
Balance
as of March 31,
2009
|
|
$ |
69,296 |
|
The
excess purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired is recorded as
goodwill. As we have one operating segment, we allocate goodwill to one
reporting unit for goodwill impairment testing. Goodwill is tested for
impairment on an annual basis, and between annual tests if indicators of
potential impairment exist, using a fair-value-based approach based on the
market capitalization of the reporting unit. Our annual impairment test was
performed as of February 28, 2010. No impairment of goodwill has been identified
during the period presented. Goodwill is deductible for tax purposes in certain
jurisdictions.
On
February 1, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of a privately-held
company for $2.2 million in net cash, $3.0 million in shares of our common stock
with the remainder to be paid in cash over the next four years. The purchase
price allocation for this acquisition included net working capital of $1.1
million, amortizable intangible assets of $5.0 million, and goodwill of $5.0
million. Our
consolidated financial statements include the operating results from the date of
acquisition.
Note
9 – Income taxes
We
account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of
temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their
reported amounts. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to amounts which are more likely than not to be
realized.
FASB ASC
740, Income Taxes (FASB
ASC 740) addresses the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in
an entity’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken
or expected to be taken on a tax return. We had $10.9 million and $11.1 million
of unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, all of which would affect our effective income tax rate if
recognized. We recorded a gross decrease in unrecognized tax benefits of $1.1
million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, as a result of a
settlement with a taxing authority. As of March 31, 2010, it is deemed
reasonable that we will recognize tax benefits in the amount of $2.4 million in
the next twelve months due to the closing of open tax years. The nature of the
uncertainty is related to deductions taken on returns that have not been
examined by the applicable tax authority. Our continuing policy is to recognize
interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. As
of March 31, 2010, we have approximately $744,000 accrued for interest related
to uncertain tax positions. The tax years 2003 through 2009 remain open to
examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which we are
subject.
Our
provision for income taxes reflected an effective tax rate of 6% and 115% for
the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the
three month period ended March 31, 2010, our effective tax rate was lower than
the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% as a result of a tax benefit from equity
awards that do not ordinarily result in a tax benefit, the partial release of a
deferred tax asset valuation allowance, an enhanced deduction for certain
research and development expenses, increased profits in foreign jurisdictions
with reduced income tax rates and a decrease in unrecognized tax benefits for
uncertain tax positions. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, our
effective tax rate was higher than the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% as a
result of non-deductible stock-based compensation expense, a change in a
valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets for which tax benefits were
previously recognized and the partial release of a deferred tax asset valuation
allowance. The partial release of the valuation allowance had the effect of
increasing our effective tax rate in the three months ended March 31, 2009,
because we reported a net loss before taxes in that period.
The tax
position of our Hungarian operation continues to benefit from assets created by
the restructuring of our operations in Hungary. In addition, effective January
1, 2010, a new tax law in Hungary provides for an enhanced deduction for the
qualified research and development expenses of NI Hungary Software and Hardware
Manufacturing Kft. (“NI Hungary”). During the three months ended December 31,
2009, we obtained confirmation of the application of this new tax law for the
qualified research and development expenses of NI Hungary. Partial release of
the valuation allowance on assets from the restructuring and the enhanced tax
deduction for research expenses resulted in income tax benefits of $3.2 and $1.1
million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Note
10 – Comprehensive income
Our
comprehensive income is comprised of net income, foreign currency translation,
unrealized gains and losses on forward and option contracts and securities
available for sale. Comprehensive income for the three month periods ended March
31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Comprehensive
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
18,353 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
Foreign
currency translation (losses), net of
taxes
|
|
|
(3,962 |
) |
|
|
(2,775 |
) |
Unrealized
(losses) on derivative instruments, net of taxes
|
|
|
(3,345 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
Unrealized
gains/(losses) on available for sale securities, net of
taxes
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
12,923 |
|
|
$ |
(2,675 |
) |
Note
11 – Stock-based compensation plans
Stock
option plans
Our
stockholders approved the 1994 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “1994 Plan”) on
May 9, 1994. At the time of approval, 9,112,500 shares of our common stock were
reserved for issuance under this plan. In 1997, an additional 7,087,500 shares
of our common stock were reserved for issuance under this plan, and an
additional 750,000 shares were reserved for issuance under this plan, as
amended, in 2004. The 1994 Plan terminated in May 2005, except with respect to
outstanding awards previously granted thereunder. Awards under the plan were
either incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal
Revenue Code or nonqualified options. The right to purchase shares vests over a
five to ten-year period, beginning on the date of grant. Vesting of ten year
awards may accelerate based on the Company’s previous year’s earnings and
revenue growth but shares cannot accelerate to vest over a period of less than
five years. Stock options must be exercised within ten years from date of grant.
Stock options were issued at the market price at the grant date. We estimate
potential forfeitures of stock grants and adjust compensation cost recorded
accordingly. The estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite
service period to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to
differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized
through a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period of change and will also
impact the amount of stock compensation expense to be recognized in future
periods. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we did not make any
changes in accounting principles or methods of estimates.
Restricted
stock plan
Our
stockholders approved our 2005 Incentive Plan on May 10, 2005. At the time of
approval, 2,700,000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance under
this plan, as well as the number of shares which had been reserved but not
issued under the 1994 Plan (our incentive stock option plan which terminated in
May 2005), and any shares that returned to the 1994 Plan as a result of
termination of options or repurchase of shares issued under such plan. The 2005
Plan, administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors,
provides for granting of incentive awards in the form of restricted stock and
restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to directors, executive officers and employees
of the Company and its subsidiaries. Awards vest over a three, five or ten-year
period, beginning on the date of grant. Vesting of ten year awards may
accelerate based on the Company’s previous year’s earnings and growth but ten
year awards cannot accelerate to vest over a period of less than five years.
Shares available for grant at March 31, 2010 were 2,256,408. We estimate
potential forfeitures of RSUs and adjust compensation cost recorded accordingly.
The estimate of forfeitures will be adjusted over the requisite service period
to the extent that actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from
such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized through a
cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period of change and will also impact the
amount of stock compensation expense to be recognized in future periods. During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, we did not make any changes in accounting
principles or methods of estimates.
Employee
stock purchase plan
Our
employee stock purchase plan permits substantially all domestic employees and
employees of designated subsidiaries to acquire our common stock at a purchase
price of 85% of the lower of the market price at the beginning or the end of the
purchase period. The plan has quarterly purchase periods beginning on February
1, May 1, August 1 and November 1 of each year. Employees may designate up to
15% of their compensation for the purchase of common stock under this plan. We
had 1,573,211 shares of common stock reserved for future employee purchases
under this plan at March 31, 2010. We issued 181,860 shares under this plan in
the three month period ended March 31, 2010. The weighted average fair value of
the employees’ purchase rights was $22.70 per share and was estimated using the
Black-Scholes model. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we did not
make any changes in accounting principles or methods of estimates.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009, stock-based compensation
recorded as a component of cost of sales, sales and marketing, research and
development, and general and administrative was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
$ |
362 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
2,104 |
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,737 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
|
4,916 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,545 |
) |
|
|
(3,014 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
3,371 |
|
|
$ |
2,017 |
|
Authorized
Preferred Stock and Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Plan
We have
5,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock. On January 21, 2004, our Board
of Directors designated 750,000 of these shares as Series A Participating
Preferred Stock in conjunction with its adoption of a Preferred Stock Rights
Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”) and declaration of a dividend of one
preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each share of common stock
outstanding held as of May 10, 2004 or issued thereafter. Each Right will
entitle its holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of National
Instruments’ Series A Participating Preferred Stock at an exercise price of
$200, subject to adjustment, under certain circumstances. The Rights Agreement
was not adopted in response to any effort to acquire control of National
Instruments.
The
Rights only become exercisable in certain limited circumstances following the
tenth day after a person or group announces acquisitions of or tender offers for
20% or more of our common stock. In addition, if an acquirer (subject to certain
exclusions for certain current stockholders of National Instruments, an
“Acquiring Person”) obtains 20% or more of our common stock, then each Right
(other than the Rights owned by an Acquiring Person or its affiliates) will
entitle the holder to purchase, for the exercise price, shares of our common
stock having a value equal to two times the exercise price. Under certain
circumstances, our Board of Directors may redeem the Rights, in whole, but not
in part, at a purchase price of $0.01 per Right. The Rights have no voting
privileges and are attached to and automatically traded with our common stock
until the occurrence of specified trigger events. The Rights will expire on the
earlier of May 10, 2014 or the exchange or redemption of the
Rights.
Note 12 – Segment
information
We
determine operating segments using the management approach. The management
approach designates the internal organization that is used by management for
making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of our
operating segments. It also requires disclosures about products and services,
geographic areas and major customers.
We have
defined our operating segment based on geographic regions. We sell our products
in three geographic regions. Our sales to these regions share similar economic
characteristics, similar product mix, similar customers, and similar
distribution methods. Accordingly, we have elected to aggregate these three
geographic regions into a single operating segment. Revenue from the sale of our
products which are similar in nature and software maintenance are reflected as
total net sales in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Total net
sales, operating income, interest income and long-lived assets, classified by
the major geographic areas in which we operate, are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas:
|
|
$ |
79,197 |
|
|
$ |
68,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe:
|
|
|
57,923 |
|
|
|
49,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
Pacific:
|
|
|
53,971 |
|
|
|
39,880 |
|
|
|
$ |
191,091 |
|
|
$ |
157,799 |
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Operating
income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$ |
13,379 |
|
|
$ |
5,307 |
|
Europe
|
|
|
27,039 |
|
|
|
16,780 |
|
Asia
Pacific
|
|
|
17,650 |
|
|
|
10,223 |
|
Unallocated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development expenses
|
|
|
(38,546 |
) |
|
|
(34,789 |
) |
|
|
$ |
19,522 |
|
|
$ |
(2,479 |
) |
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
Europe
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Asia
Pacific
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
589 |
|
|
|
March
31,
2010
|
|
|
December
31,
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$ |
100,555 |
|
|
$ |
100,489 |
|
Europe
|
|
|
35,407 |
|
|
|
36,555 |
|
Asia
Pacific
|
|
|
16,605 |
|
|
|
16,221 |
|
|
|
$ |
152,567 |
|
|
$ |
153,265 |
|
Total
sales outside the United States for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 were $119.4 million and $96.2 million, respectively.
Note
13 – Commitments and Contingencies
We offer
a one-year limited warranty on most hardware products, with a two or three-year
warranty on a subset of our hardware products, which is included in the sales
price of many of our products. Provision is made for estimated future warranty
costs at the time of the sale, for the estimated costs that may be incurred
under the basic limited warranty. Our estimate is based on historical experience
and product sales during this period.
The
warranty reserve for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Balance
at the beginning of the
period
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
$ |
952 |
|
Accruals
for warranties issued during the
period
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
Settlements
made (in cash or in kind) during the period
|
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
Balance
at the end of the
period
|
|
$ |
922 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
As of
March 31, 2010, we have outstanding guarantees for payment of foreign operating
leases, customs and foreign grants totaling approximately $5.1
million.
As of
March 31, 2010, we have non-cancelable purchase commitments with various
suppliers of customized inventory and inventory components totaling
approximately $7.5 million over the next twelve months.
Note
14 – Recently issued accounting pronouncements
In
October 2009, the FASB updated FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (FASB ASC
605) that amended the criteria for separating consideration in
multiple-deliverable arrangements. The amendments establish a selling price
hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price
used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence if
available, third–party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not
available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific objective
evidence nor third-party evidence is available. The amendments will change the
application of the residual method of allocation and require that arrangement
consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all
deliverables using the relative selling price method. The relative selling price
method allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionally to each
deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s selling price. This update will
be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially
modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted. We are currently evaluating the requirements of this update and have
not yet determined the impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
In
October 2009, the FASB updated FASB ASC 985, Software (FASB ASC 985) that
changes the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible
products and software elements. Tangible products containing software components
and non-software components that function together to deliver the tangible
product’s essential functionality are no longer within the scope of the software
revenue guidance in Subtopic 985-605. In addition, the amendments require that
hardware components of a tangible product containing software components always
be excluded from the software revenue guidance. This update will be effective
prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in
fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted.
We are currently evaluating the requirements of this update and have not yet
determined the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2010, the FASB updated FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (FASB ASC 820) that requires additional disclosures and
clarifies existing disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The additional
disclosures include 1) transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and 2) activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements. The update provides amendments that clarify
existing disclosures on 1) level of disaggregation and 2) disclosures about
inputs and valuation techniques. This update will be effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the
disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll
forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. These disclosures are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. We adopted the update on January 1, 2010 as
required and concluded it did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
In
February 2010, the FASB updated FASB ASC 855, Subsequent Events (FASB ASC
855) that requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events
through the date that the financial statements are issued. For an SEC filer,
this guidance also eliminates the required disclosure of the date through which
subsequent events are evaluated. This update is effective upon
issuance. We adopted the update on January 1, 2010 as required and concluded it
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results
of operations.
Note
15 – Litigation
We filed
a patent infringement action on January 25, 2001, in the U.S. District Court,
Eastern District of Texas (Marshall Division) claiming that The MathWorks, Inc.
(“MathWorks”) infringed certain of our U.S. patents. On January 30, 2003, a jury
found infringement by MathWorks of three of the patents involved and awarded us
specified damages. On September 23, 2003, the District Court entered final
judgment in favor of us and entered an injunction against MathWorks’ sale of its
Simulink and related products and stayed the injunction pending appeal. Upon
appeal, the judgment and the injunction were affirmed by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (September 3, 2004). Subsequently the stay of
injunction was lifted by the District Court. In November 2004, the final
judgment amount of $7.4 million which had been held in escrow pending appeal was
released to us.
An action
was filed by MathWorks against us on September 22, 2004, in the U.S. District
Court, Eastern District of Texas (Marshall Division), claiming that on that day
MathWorks had released modified versions of its Simulink and related products,
and seeking a declaratory judgment that the modified products do not infringe
the three patents adjudged infringed in the District Court's decision of
September 23, 2003 (and affirmed by the Court of Appeals on September 3, 2004).
On November 2, 2004, MathWorks served the complaint on us. We filed an answer to
MathWorks’ declaratory judgment complaint, denying MathWorks’ claims of
non-infringement and alleging our own affirmative defenses. On January 5, 2005,
the Court denied a contempt motion by us to enjoin the modified Simulink
products under the injunction in effect from the first case. On January 7, 2005,
we amended our answer to include counterclaims that MathWorks’ modified products
are infringing three of our patents, and requested unspecified damages and an
injunction. MathWorks filed its reply to our counterclaims on February 7, 2005,
denying the counterclaims and alleging affirmative defenses. On March 2, 2005,
we filed a notice of appeal regarding the Court's denial of the contempt motion.
On March 15, 2005, the Court stayed MathWorks’ declaratory judgment action,
pending a decision on the appeal by the Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit. On February 9, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
affirmed the District Court’s January 2005 order. On November 22, 2006, the
District Court lifted the stay. The case schedule has yet to be set in this
action. During the fourth quarter of 2004, we accrued $4 million related to our
probable loss from this contingency, which consists entirely of anticipated
patent defense costs that are probable of being incurred. In the
fourth quarter of 2006, we accrued an additional $600,000 related to this
contingency. During the third quarter of 2009, we reduced the accrual by $2
million and during the first quarter of 2010, we reduced the accrual by an
additional $1,037,000 to reflect a decrease in the estimated costs that are
probable of being incurred in this action. To date, we have charged a cumulative
total of $623,000 against this accrual. At March 31, the remaining accrual was
$936,000.
Note
16 – Subsequent events
We have
evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were
issued.
On April
21, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per
common share, payable June 1, 2010, to shareholders of record on May 10,
2010.
On April
21, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase plan that
increased the aggregate number of shares of common stock that we are authorized
to repurchase from 674,098 to 3.0 million.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements contained herein regarding our
future financial performance or operations (including, without limitation,
statements to the effect that we “believe,” "expect," "plan," "may," "will,"
"project," "continue," or "estimate" or other variations thereof or comparable
terminology or the negative thereof) should be considered forward-looking
statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the
forward-looking statements as a result of a number of important factors,
including those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page 34,
and the discussion below. Readers are also encouraged to refer to the documents
regularly filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of our business and the risks
attendant thereto.
Overview
National
Instruments Corporation (“we”, “us” or “our”) is a leading supplier of
measurement and automation products that engineers and scientists use in a wide
range of industries. These industries comprise a large and diverse market for
design, control and test applications. We provide flexible application software
and modular, multifunctional hardware that users combine with industry-standard
computers, networks and third party devices to create measurement, automation
and embedded systems, which we also refer to as “virtual instruments”. Our
approach gives customers the ability to quickly and cost-effectively design,
prototype and deploy unique custom-defined solutions for their design, control
and test application needs. We sell to a large number of customers in a wide
variety of industries. No single customer accounted for more than 3% of our
sales in the three months ended March 31, 2010 or in the years 2009, 2008 or
2007.
The key
strategies that management focuses on in running our business are the
following:
Expanding
our broad customer base
We strive
to increase our already broad customer base by serving a large market on many
computer platforms, through a global marketing and distribution network. We also
seek to acquire new technologies and expertise from time to time in order to
open new opportunities for our existing product portfolio.
Maintaining
a high level of customer satisfaction
To
maintain a high level of customer satisfaction we strive to offer innovative,
modular and integrated products through a global sales and support network. We
strive to maintain a high degree of backwards compatibility across different
platforms in order to preserve the customer’s investment in our products. In
this time of intense global competition, we believe it is crucial that we
continue to offer products with quality and reliability, and that these products
provide cost-effective solutions for our customers.
Leveraging
external and internal technology
Our
product strategy is to provide superior products by leveraging generally
available technology, supporting open architectures on multiple platforms and by
leveraging our core technologies such as custom application specific integrated
circuits (“ASICs”) across multiple products.
We sell
into test and measurement (“T&M”) and industrial/embedded applications in a
broad range of industries and as such are subject to the economic and industry
forces which drive those markets. It has been our experience that the
performance of these industries and our performance is impacted by general
trends in industrial production for the global economy and by the specific
performance of certain vertical markets that are intensive consumers of
measurement technologies. Examples of these markets are semiconductor capital
equipment, telecom, defense, aerospace, automotive and others. In assessing our
business, we consider the trends in the Global Purchasing Managers Index (“PMI”)
published by JP Morgan, global industrial production as well as industry reports
on the specific vertical industries that we target. Starting in August 2009, the
PMI has had readings above 50 which are indicative of expansion in the
industrial global economy. We are unable to predict whether the current
expansion cycle, as measured by the PMI, will be sustained throughout
2010.
We
distribute our software and hardware products primarily through a direct sales
organization. We also use independent distributors, OEMs, VARs, system
integrators and consultants to market our products. We have sales offices in the
U.S. and sales offices and distributors in key international markets. Sales
outside of the Americas accounted for approximately 59% and 57% or our revenues
for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
vast majority of our foreign sales are denominated in the customers’ local
currency, which exposes us to the effects of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. We expect that a significant portion of our total revenues will
continue to be derived from international sales. (See Note 12 – Segment
information of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for details concerning
the geographic breakdown of our net sales, operating income, interest income and
long-lived assets).
We
manufacture a substantial majority of our products at our facilities in
Debrecen, Hungary. Additional production primarily of low volume or newly
introduced products is done in Austin, Texas. Our product manufacturing
operations can be divided into four areas: electronic circuit card and module
assembly; chassis and cable assembly; technical manuals and product support
documentation; and software duplication. We manufacture most of the electronic
circuit card assemblies, and modules in-house, although subcontractors are used
from time to time. We currently use subcontractors in Asia to manufacture a
significant portion of our chassis but we review these arrangements
periodically. We manufacture some of our electronic cable assemblies in-house,
but many assemblies are produced by subcontractors. We primarily subcontract our
software duplication, our technical manuals and product support
documentation.
We
believe that our long-term growth and success depends on delivering high quality
software and hardware products on a timely basis. Accordingly, we focus
significant efforts on research and development. We focus our research and
development efforts on enhancing existing products and developing new products
that incorporate appropriate features and functionality to be competitive with
respect to technology, price and performance. Our success also is dependent on
our ability to obtain and maintain patents and other proprietary rights related
to technologies used in our products. We have engaged in litigation and where
necessary, will likely engage in future litigation to protect our intellectual
property rights. In monitoring and policing our intellectual property rights, we
have been and may be required to spend significant resources.
We have
been profitable in every year since 1990. However, there can be no assurance
that our net sales will grow or that we will remain profitable in future
periods. Our operating results fluctuate from period to period due to changes in
global economic conditions and a number of other factors. As a result, we
believe historical results of operations should not be relied upon as
indications of future performance.
Current
business outlook
Many of
the industries we serve have historically been cyclical and have experienced
periodic downturns. Our customers across all industries and geographic regions
demonstrated reduced order patterns throughout most of 2009. During
the fourth quarter of 2009, we began to see positive trends in the order
patterns of our customers and have seen those trends continue during our first
quarter of 2010. These positive order trends are consistent with the expansion
we have seen in the global industrial economy as measured by the global PMI
which has risen from 50 in July 2009 to 57 in March 2010. We have seen these
positive trends across all geographic regions and across all the vertical
markets that we serve although the strength of the trend varies by region and by
market. We are unable to predict whether the current expansion cycle, as
measured by the PMI, will be sustained throughout 2010. If this expansion cannot
be sustained, it could have an adverse effect on the spending patterns of
businesses including our current and potential customers which could adversely
affect our revenues and therefore harm our business and result of operations.
Our key strategies are to maintain a stable gross margin and to optimize our
operating cost structure while maintaining strong employee
productivity.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentage of net
sales represented by certain items reflected in our Consolidated Statements of
Income:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net
sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
41.4 |
% |
|
|
43.4 |
% |
Europe
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
Asia
Pacific
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
Consolidated
net sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
77.4 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
67.2 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Net
foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Other
income (expense), net
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
Provision
for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Net
Sales. Consolidated net sales were $191 million and $158
million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
an increase of 21%. This increase can be attributed to increases in
sales volume across all areas of our business. Products in the areas of virtual
instrumentation and graphical system design, which comprised approximately 92%
of our revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2010, saw a year-over-year
revenue increase of 19%. Instrument control products, which comprised
approximately 8% of our revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2010, saw a
year-over-year revenue increase of 48%. For the three months ended March 31,
2009, instrument control products comprised 6% of our revenues, while virtual
instrumentation and graphical system design comprised 94% of our revenues. Our
instrument control products are the most economically sensitive portion of our
revenue. We did not take any significant action with regard to product pricing
during the three months ended March 31, 2010, and thus, the increase in revenues
is attributable to an increase in customer orders.
Sales in
the Americas were $79 million and $68 million for the three month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of 16%. Sales outside of the
Americas, as a percentage of consolidated sales, increased to 59% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 compared to 57% for the comparable period in 2009.
Sales in Europe were $58 million and $49 million for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of 17%. Sales in Asia
were $54 million and $40 million for the three month periods ended March 31,
2010, and 2009, respectively, an increase of 35%. We expect sales outside of the
Americas to continue to represent a significant portion of our revenue. We
intend to continue to expand our international operations by increasing our
presence in existing markets, adding a presence in some new geographical markets
and continuing the use of distributors to sell our products in some
countries.
Almost
all sales made by our direct sales offices in the non U.S. Americas, in Europe
and in Asia Pacific are denominated in local currencies, and accordingly, the
U.S. dollar equivalent of these sales is affected by changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, net of hedging
results, the change in exchange rates had the effect of increasing our
consolidated sales by $12 million or 7%, increasing Americas sales by $1.5
million or 2%, increasing European sales by $7 million or 14%, and increasing
sales in Asia Pacific by $3.1 million or 8% compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2009.
Gross
Profit. As a percentage of sales, gross margin was 77% and 74%
for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Gross
margin increased in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily as a result
of increased sales volumes compared to the same period in 2009. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, charges related to acquisition related intangibles
and stock based compensation decreased to $1.1 million from $1.2 million during
the comparable period in 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the
net impact of foreign currency exchange rates had the effect of increasing our
cost of goods sold by $759,000 million or 2%.
Sales and
Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses were $74 million and
$69 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010, and 2009,
respectively, an increase of 8%. As a percentage of net sales, sales and
marketing expenses were 39% and 44% over the same periods. The decrease in sales
and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue was due to the 21% increase in
revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009. The increase in sales and marketing expenses in
absolute dollars was due to an increase in personnel related expenses of $2.3
million which includes commissions and variable compensation, as well as an
increase caused by the net impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
of $3.5 million. We plan to continue to make investments in our field sales
force during the remainder of 2010. However, our field sales expansion during
the remainder of 2010 will likely be targeted to strategic areas of need,
whether technical or regional. We expect sales and marketing expenses in future
periods to continue to fluctuate as a percentage of sales based on recruiting,
marketing and advertising campaign costs associated with major new product
releases and entry into new market areas, investment in web sales and marketing
efforts, increasing product demonstration costs and the timing of domestic and
international conferences and trade shows.
Research and
Development. Research and development expenses were $39
million and $35 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010, and
2009, respectively, an increase of 11%. As a percentage of net sales, research
and development expenses were 20% and 22% over the same periods. The decrease in
research and development expenses as a percentage of revenue was due to the 21%
increase in revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase in research and development
expenses in absolute dollars was due to an increase in personnel related
expenses of $3.1 million which primarily consist of benefits and variable
compensation as well as an increase caused by the net impact of changes in
foreign currency exchange rates of $740,000. The suspension of temporary cost
cutting measures implemented during 2009, which included a company-wide wage
reduction as well as a reduction in the number of accrued vacation hours that
employees were allowed to carry beyond the end of a fiscal year, resulted in an
additional cost increase of $955,000 compared to the first quarter of 2009. We
plan to continue to make additional investments in our research and development
group during the remainder of 2010. However, our research and development
expansion during the remainder of 2010 will likely be targeted to strategic
areas of need.
We
capitalize software development costs in accordance with FASB ASC
985. We amortize such costs over the related product’s estimated
economic life, generally three years, beginning when a product becomes available
for general release. Software amortization expense included in cost of goods
sold totaled $2.6 million and $2.1 million during the three month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Internally developed software costs
capitalized during the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, were
$3.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively. Capitalization of internally
developed software costs varies depending on the timing of when each project
reaches technological feasibility and the length and scope of the development
cycle of each individual project. (See Note 7 - Intangibles of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of
intangibles).
General and
Administrative. General and
administrative expenses were $15 million and $16 million for the three month
periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, a decrease of 3%. As a
percentage of net sales, general and administrative expenses were 8% and 10%
over the same periods. The decrease in general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of revenue was driven by the 21% increase in revenue during the three
months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded a reduction of our
patent litigation accrual which resulted in a non-cash decrease to our general
and administrative expenses of $1.1 million. This decrease was offset to some
extent by personnel related expenses consisting of variable compensation had the
effect of increasing general and administrative expenses by $400,000 and the net
impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates had the effect of
increasing our general and administrative expenses by $541,000. We expect that
general and administrative expenses in future periods will fluctuate in absolute
dollars and as a percentage of revenue.
Interest
Income. Interest income
was $300,000 and $589,000 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively, a decrease of 49%. The decrease is attributable to a
continued decrease in investment yields. The source of interest income is from
the investment of our cash and short-term and long-term
investments.
Net Foreign
Exchange Gain (Loss). Net foreign exchange (loss) was
($698,000) and ($702,000) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. These results are attributable to movements in the foreign
currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies in
subsidiaries for which our functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. We
recognize the local currency as the functional currency in virtually all of our
international subsidiaries.
We
utilize foreign currency forward contracts to hedge our foreign denominated net
foreign currency balance sheet positions to help protect against the change in
value caused by a fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates. We typically
hedge up to 90% of our outstanding foreign denominated net receivable or payable
positions and typically limit the duration of these foreign currency forward
contracts to approximately 90 days. The gain or loss on these derivatives as
well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedge item attributable to the hedged
risk is recognized in current earnings under the line item “Net foreign exchange
gain (loss)”. Our hedging strategy reduced our foreign exchange losses by
$439,000 and $3.1 million during the three month periods ended March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
To
protect against the change in the value caused by a fluctuation in foreign
currency exchange rates of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from
international sales and expenses over the next one to two years, we have a
foreign currency cash flow hedging program. We hedge portions of our forecasted
revenue and forecasted expenses denominated in foreign currencies with forward
and option contracts. For forward contracts, when the dollar strengthens
significantly against the foreign currencies, the change in the present value of
future foreign currency cash flows may be offset by the change in the fair value
of the forward contracts designated as hedges. For purchased option contracts,
when the dollar strengthens significantly against the foreign currencies, the
change in the present value of future foreign currency cash flows may be offset
by the change in the fair value of the option contracts designated as hedges,
net of the premium paid. Our foreign currency purchased option contracts are
purchased “at-the-money” or “out-of-the-money.” We purchase foreign currency
forward and option contracts for up to 100% of our forecasted exposures in
selected currencies (primarily in Euro, Japanese yen, British pound sterling and
Hungarian forint) and limit the duration of these contracts to 40 months or
less. As a result, our hedging activities only partially address our risks from
foreign currency transactions, and there can be no assurance that this strategy
will be successful. We do not invest in contracts for speculative purposes. (See
Note 5 - Derivative instruments and hedging activities of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for a description of our forward and purchased option
contracts and hedged positions).
Provision for
Income Taxes. Our provision for income taxes reflected an
effective tax rate of 6% and 115% for the three month periods ended March 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in our effective tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to March 31, 2009, was due to the
following;
Effective
tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
115% |
|
Decrease
in unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
(47%) |
|
Change
in valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets for which tax
benefits were previously recognized, recorded during the three months
ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(18%) |
|
Increased
profits in foreign jurisdictions with reduced income tax
rates
|
|
|
(17%) |
|
Decrease
in non-deductible stock-based compensation expense as a percentage of net
income
|
|
|
(14%) |
|
Enhanced
deduction for certain research and development expenses in
2010
|
|
|
(12%) |
|
Increase
in the tax benefit from equity awards that do not ordinarily result in a
tax benefit
|
|
|
(6%) |
|
Increase
in the partial release of a deferred tax asset valuation
allowance
|
|
|
(3%) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(2%) |
|
Expiration
of the research and development tax credit as of December 31,
2009
|
|
|
10% |
|
Effective
tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
6% |
|
(See Note
9 – Income taxes of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion regarding our effective tax rate and a discussion of income taxes at
the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35% and our effective tax
rate).
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Working Capital,
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments. The
following table presents our working capital, cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities (in thousands):
|
|
March
31, 2010
|
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
Increase/
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working
capital
|
|
$ |
407,561 |
|
|
$ |
413,759 |
|
|
$ |
(6,198 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents
(1)
|
|
|
184,618 |
|
|
|
201,465 |
|
|
|
(16,847 |
) |
Short-term
investments
(1)
|
|
|
110,952 |
|
|
|
87,196 |
|
|
|
23,756 |
|
Total
cash, cash equivalents, short and long-term investments
|
|
$ |
295,570 |
|
|
$ |
288,661 |
|
|
$ |
6,909 |
|
(1) Included
in working capital
Our
working capital decreased by $6 million during the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to December 31, 2009, due to the net effect of cash provided by
operations offset by repurchases of shares of our common stock, dividend
payments and capital expenditures.
Our cash
and cash equivalent balances are held in numerous financial institutions
throughout the world, including substantial amounts held outside of the U.S.,
however, the majority of our cash and investments that are located outside of
the U.S. are denominated in the U.S. dollar with the exception of $33 million
U.S. dollar equivalent that is denominated in Euro. Most of the amounts held
outside of the U.S. could be repatriated to the U.S., but under current law,
would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less applicable foreign tax
credits. In some countries repatriation of certain foreign balances is
restricted by local laws. We have provided for the U.S. federal tax liability on
these amounts for financial statement purposes, except for foreign earnings that
are considered indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. Repatriation could
result in additional U.S. federal income tax payments in future years. We
utilize a variety of tax planning and financing strategies with the objective of
having our worldwide cash available in the locations in which it is
needed.
Cash Provided and
(Used) in 2010 and 2009. Cash and cash
equivalents decreased to $185 million at March 31, 2010 from $201 million at
December 31, 2009. The following table summarizes the proceeds and (uses) of
cash (in thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Cash
provided by operating
activities
|
|
$ |
41,601 |
|
|
$ |
24,806 |
|
Cash
(used by) investing
activities
|
|
|
(38,195 |
) |
|
|
(15,282 |
) |
Cash
(used by) financing
activities
|
|
|
(20,253 |
) |
|
|
(11,476 |
) |
Net
(decrease) in cash
equivalents
|
|
|
(16,847 |
) |
|
|
(1,952 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of
year
|
|
|
201,465 |
|
|
|
229,400 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$ |
184,618 |
|
|
$ |
227,448 |
|
Our
operating activities provided cash of $42 million and $25 million for the three
month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, a 68% increase. For
the three months ended March 31, 2010, cash provided by operating activities was
the result of $18 million of net income, $18 million in net non-cash operating
expenses which consisted of depreciation and amortization, stock-based
compensation and benefits from deferred income taxes, and by $6 million in net
cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities, principally a $10
million increase in accounts payable, deferred revenue and tax and other
liabilities, offset by a $3.9 million increase in accounts receivable,
inventories and prepaid expenses and other assets. For the three months ended
March 31, 2009, cash provided by operating activities was the result of $12
million in net non-cash operating expenses which consisted of depreciation and
amortization, stock-based compensation, benefits from deferred income taxes, and
by $12 million in net cash provided by changes in operating assets and
liabilities, principally a $31 million decrease in accounts
receivable.
Accounts
receivable was relatively constant at $105 million at March 31, 2010 compared to
$104 million at December 31, 2009. Days sales outstanding was 49 days at March
31, 2010, compared to 61 days at December 31, 2009. We typically bill customers
on an open account basis subject to our standard net thirty day payment terms.
If, in the longer term, our revenue increases, it is likely that our accounts
receivable balance will also increase. Our accounts receivable could also
increase if customers delay their payments or if we grant extended payment terms
to customers, both of which are more likely to occur during challenging economic
times when our customers may face issues gaining access to sufficient funding or
credit.
Consolidated
inventory balances increased to $90 million at March 31, 2010 from $87 million
at December 31, 2009. Inventory turns were 2.0 at March 31, 2010, compared to
1.8 at December 31, 2009. The increase in inventory during the three months
ended March 31, 2010, was driven by an increase in our manufacturing activities
in response to the positive order trends we have seen over the last six months.
Our inventory levels will continue to be determined based upon our anticipated
demand for products and our need to keep sufficient inventory on hand to meet
our customers’ demands. Such considerations are balanced against the risk of
obsolescence or potentially excess inventory levels. Rapid changes in customer
demand could have a significant impact on our inventory balances in future
periods.
Investing
activities used cash of $38 million during the three months ended March 31,
2010, which was the result of the net purchase of $27 million of short-term
investments, the purchase of property and equipment of $5 million, and
capitalization of internally developed software of $3.4 million. Investing
activities used cash of $15 million during the three months ended March 31,
2009, which was the result of the net purchase of $8 million of short-term
investments, the purchase of property and equipment of $3.0 million,
capitalization of internally developed software of $3.1 million and the
acquisition of other intangibles of $1.3 million.
Financing
activities used $20 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010, which
was the result of $31 million used to repurchase our common stock and $10
million used to pay dividends to our stockholders, offset by $22 million
received as a result of the issuance of our common stock from the exercise of
stock options and our employee stock purchase plan. The repurchase of our common
stock resulted in a reduction to common stock of $10,000, a reduction to paid in
capital of $4.4 million and a reduction to retained earnings of $27 million.
Financing activities used $11 million during the three months ended March 31,
2009, which was the result of $9 million used to repurchase our common stock and
$9 million used to pay dividends to our stockholders, offset by $7 million
received as a result of the issuance of our common stock from the exercise of
stock options and our employee stock purchase plan.
From time
to time our Board of Directors has authorized various programs to repurchase
shares of our common stock depending on market conditions and other factors.
Under such programs, we repurchased a total of 1,014,229 shares of our common
stock at a weighted average price per share of $30.50 during the three months
ended March 31, 2010, and 1,443,441 and 4,110,042 shares of our common stock at
weighted average prices of $23.96 and $25.22 per share, in the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
On April
21, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a new share purchase plan which
increased the aggregate number of shares of common stock that we are authorized
to repurchase from 674,098 to 3.0 million. This repurchase plan does not have an
expiration date.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, we received increased proceeds from the
exercise of stock options compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. The
timing and number of stock option exercises and the amount of cash proceeds we
receive through those exercises are not within our control and in the future, we
may not generate as much cash from the exercise of stock options as we have in
the past. Moreover, since 2005 it has been our practice to issue restricted
stock units and not stock options to eligible employees which will reduce the
number of stock options available for exercise in the future. Unlike the
exercise of stock options, the issuance of shares upon vesting of restricted
stock units does not result in any cash proceeds to us.
Contractual Cash
Obligations. Purchase obligations primarily represent purchase
commitments for customized inventory and inventory components. As of March 31,
2010, we have non-cancelable purchase commitments with various suppliers of
customized inventory and inventory components totaling approximately $8 million.
At December 31, 2009, we had non-cancelable purchase commitments with various
suppliers of customized inventory and inventory components totaling
approximately $7 million.
Guarantees
are related to payments of customs and foreign grants. As of March 31, 2010, we
have outstanding guarantees for payment of customs and foreign grants totaling
approximately $5 million. As of December 31, 2009, we had outstanding guarantees
for payment of customs and foreign grants totaling approximately $5
million.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements. We do not have any debt or off-balance sheet
debt. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we did not have any
relationships with any unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such
as entities often referred to as structured finance entities, which would have
been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements. As such, we are not exposed to any financing,
liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we were engaged in such
relationships.
Prospective
Capital Needs. We believe that our existing cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities, together with cash generated from
operations and from the exercise of employee stock options and the purchase of
common stock through our employee stock purchase plan, will be sufficient to
cover our working capital needs, capital expenditures, investment requirements,
commitments, payment of dividends to our stockholders and repurchases of our
common stock for at least the next 12 months. However, we may choose or be
required to raise additional funds by selling equity or debt securities to the
public or to selected investors, or by borrowing money from financial
institutions. Historically, we have not had to rely on debt, public or private,
to fund our operating, financing or investing activities. We could also choose
or be required to reduce certain expenditures, such as payments of dividends or
repurchases of our common stock. In addition, even though we may not need
additional funds, we may still elect to sell additional equity or debt
securities or obtain credit facilities for other reasons. If we elect to raise
additional funds, we may not be able to obtain such funds on a timely basis or
on acceptable terms, if at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing
additional equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership percentages of
existing stockholders would be reduced. In addition, the equity or debt
securities that we issue may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to
those of our common stock.
Although
we believe that we have sufficient capital to fund our activities for at least
the next 12 months, our future capital requirements may vary materially from
those now planned. We anticipate that the amount of capital we will need in the
future will depend on many factors, including:
·
|
general
economic and political conditions and specific conditions in the markets
we address, including the continuing fluctuations in the industrial
economy, current general economic conditions and trends in the industrial
economy in various geographic regions in which we do
business;
|
·
|
the
inability of certain of our customers who depend on credit to have access
to their traditional sources of credit to finance the purchase of products
from us, particularly in the current global economic environment, which
may lead them to reduce their level of purchases or to seek credit or
other accommodations from us;
|
·
|
the
overall levels of sales of our products and gross profit
margins;
|
·
|
our
business, product, capital expenditure and research and development plans,
and product and technology
roadmaps;
|
·
|
repurchases
of our common stock;
|
·
|
required
levels of research and development and other operating
costs;
|
·
|
litigation
expenses, settlements and
judgments;
|
·
|
the
levels of inventory and accounts receivable that we
maintain;
|
·
|
acquisitions
of other businesses, assets, products or
technologies;
|